← LegalQuants LitigationCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
changed
changed
Update to LegalQuants Litigation
Snapshot Oct 9, 2026 · 00:08 UTC · version 0.1.0
Package or technical metadata updated
Discoverability changed from “UNLISTED” to “LISTED”.
Observed in package metadata. These changes alone do not establish a new customer-facing feature.
Discoverability
Before
UNLISTED
After
LISTED
Share url
Before
Not present
After
https://chatgpt.com/plugins/plugins_6aa118e4284081918b44f45b58d06de6?open_in_app
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 2 changed fields
changed /discoverability
BEFORE
"UNLISTED"
AFTER
"LISTED"
changed /share_url
BEFORE
null
AFTER
"https://chatgpt.com/plugins/plugins_6aa118e4284081918b44f45b58d06de6?open_in_app"
Full snapshot data
{
"canonical_app_id": null,
"connector_id": null,
"created_at": "2026-09-11T11:13:38.622561Z",
"discoverability": "LISTED",
"id": "plugins_6aa118e4284081918b44f45b58d06de6",
"is_template": false,
"name": "legalquants-litigation",
"release": {
"app_ids": [],
"app_manifest": null,
"app_templates": [],
"description": "Source-grounded legal workflows for litigators, with shared daily-practice tools.",
"display_name": "LegalQuants Litigation",
"id": "pluginrel_1ecfced805988191b79e6d5cc1af249a",
"interface": {
"brand_color": null,
"capabilities": [],
"category": "Productivity",
"composer_icon_dark_url": null,
"composer_icon_url": "https://files.openai.com/content?id=file_000000006a9481f5b7d5bbabd183b778",
"default_prompt": "Check every authority in their motion. The authorities I have are in this folder.",
"default_prompts": [
"Check every authority in their motion. The authorities I have are in this folder.",
"Pressure-test the other side's motion against our documents.",
"Prepare a deposition outline for our witness from the matter record, with exhibits."
],
"developer_name": "LegalQuants",
"logo_url": "https://files.openai.com/content?id=file_0000000039e481f5b9f0a73943313467",
"logo_url_dark": null,
"long_description": "Source-grounded legal workflows for litigators, with shared daily-practice tools.",
"plugin_category_id": "productivity",
"privacy_policy_url": "https://legalquants.com/privacy",
"screenshot_urls": [],
"short_description": "Workflows for litigators",
"terms_of_service_url": "https://legalquants.com/terms",
"website_url": "https://legalquants.com"
},
"keywords": [
"legal",
"skills",
"agents"
],
"mcp_servers": [],
"onboarding_skill_name": null,
"requires_local_executor": false,
"skills": [
{
"description": "Verify supplied citations, check authorities, and detect hallucinated case law before filing. Use when the user asks to cite-check a brief, validate authorities, verify quotations, or catch fabricated citations.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $cite-check to check this filing against the authorities I provide.",
"display_name": "Cite Check",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "search",
"short_description": "Verify citations against supplied authorities"
},
"name": "cite-check",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e9c6f48191902d752a31548fc3"
},
{
"description": "Prepare evidence-first litigation matter, event, portfolio, or outside-counsel status updates that separate verified developments from analysis, recommendations, and decisions, and make deadlines, budgets, exposure, risks, owners, sources, and recipient boundaries actionable. Use when a lawyer needs a decision-ready client report or portfolio view; do not send or publish it.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $client-update to prepare an evidence-first matter or portfolio update for this audience.",
"display_name": "Client Update",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "chart",
"short_description": "Prepare a decision-ready litigation update"
},
"name": "client-update",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e727108191ba61166dbf7d5516"
},
{
"description": "Triage inbound and draft source-grounded U.S. litigation correspondence, including discovery meet-and-confer letters, settlement demands and counteroffers, and substantive pre-suit or case communications. Use when a lawyer needs a precise, review-ready draft with authority, fact provenance, deadlines, negotiation-status cautions, and a no-send gate.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $correspondence to triage or draft this litigation correspondence with a no-send review gate.",
"display_name": "Litigation Correspondence",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "chat",
"short_description": "Draft source-grounded litigation correspondence"
},
"name": "correspondence",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e94e0481918d60d8ee87c4117f"
},
{
"description": "Prepare, conduct, and close the loop on a deposition using claims, elements, chronology, exhibits, admissions, impeachment, ethics, and transcript evidence. Use when planning a deposition, preparing a witness, structuring Rule 30(b)(6) topics, or extracting deposition follow-up.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $depositions to build a source-backed deposition plan and post-testimony workflow.",
"display_name": "Depositions",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "hierarchy",
"short_description": "Plan depositions around proof and testimony"
},
"name": "depositions",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e6f7508191b251974fbafcc015"
},
{
"description": "Review an incoming litigation production against the matter's requests or issues, with deterministic inventory and coverage receipts, a plain-language setup approval, human privilege decisions, source-linked Requests/Documents HTML, and drift-bound lawyer feedback. Use when asked to organize or review a production, map documents to RFPs or pleadings, identify production gaps, or prepare a privilege queue.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $docreview to review this production against our requests and flag the gaps.",
"display_name": "Document Review",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "pdf",
"short_description": "Review a litigation production against the requests"
},
"name": "docreview",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118ea9438819194aaf4dc0eaa0dfb"
},
{
"description": "Plan, draft, and review U.S. federal civil preservation and document-discovery work, including editable response shells, source-linked objection-library curation, local objection-review pages, and Word drafts from attorney selections. Use for bounded preservation, requests, responses, subpoena triage, privilege-log routing, and conferral work; not service, production, filing, contact, system changes, or incoming-production review.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $document-discovery to prepare an editable response shell, review proposed objections, or build a reusable objection library from these files.",
"display_name": "Document Discovery",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "pdf",
"short_description": "Draft discovery responses and curate objections"
},
"name": "document-discovery",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118ea2ffc81919e5e237046283bc8"
},
{
"description": "Create one polished, editable, evidence-grounded HTML explanation of supplied or completed legal work. Use for a self-contained one-pager, a slide brief with a clickable overview, visual companions to advice or findings, reusable templates, and firm color setup. Resolve missing intake before designing; preserve the fixed house components, editor, popups, and client/template exports.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $legaldesign to design a page that explains this legal work to the client.",
"display_name": "LegalDesign",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "pdf",
"short_description": "One editable, evidence-grounded page that explains legal work"
},
"name": "legaldesign",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118eb07488191847221a573ac8af0"
},
{
"description": "Ask which CODEX for Legal skill fits the work in front of you. A map of the installed skills by situation, with one pick and the prompt to type, and a line on what the other LegalQuants plugins add. The same door ships in every LegalQuants plugin. Type it when you do not know what to type. Not for doing legal work, and not a coach.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $lq-start to tell me which skill fits: <the task in front of you, or your practice>",
"display_name": "Start",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "hierarchy",
"short_description": "Which skill fits your work. Same door in every LegalQuants plugin; pick any"
},
"name": "lq-start",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e7169c8191be41b4f740985801"
},
{
"description": "Open a litigation matter through a human-confirmed intake that records the parties, role, side, forum, engagement and authority, conflicts posture, emergency dates, preservation posture, status, stable identifiers, and field-level provenance. Use when a new dispute, claim, subpoena, regulatory inquiry, investigation, or pre-suit threat needs a controlled matter record and a handoff to organize-case-docs.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $new-matter to create a reviewable intake record and case-organization handoff.",
"display_name": "New Matter",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "hierarchy",
"short_description": "Open a controlled litigation matter record"
},
"name": "new-matter",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e83f2c81918e7ddfd35db435e4"
},
{
"description": "Turn an accepted or active litigation matter’s documents and metadata into a provenance-backed case workspace with source inventory, chronology, proof charts, issue and evidence mapping, trackers, lifecycle controls, and an explicit docreview handoff. Use after controlled intake or when restructuring, updating, or closing a matter; use new-matter to create the initial matter record.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $organize-case-docs to map these case documents into chronology, proof, and issue artifacts.",
"display_name": "Organize Case Documents",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "hierarchy",
"short_description": "Build a provenance-backed case workspace"
},
"name": "organize-case-docs",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e7fa3c8191ad6c0d6607c9b570"
},
{
"description": "Pressure-test a legal position against the documents the user supplies. Use only when the user explicitly asks to pressure-test, stress-test or red-team an argument, or asks whether a pleading, submission, advice, connected contract set or the other side's case holds together on its own logic, dates, figures and cross-document consistency. Not for verifying citations or authorities (that is /cite-check), reading a redline, or legal research.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $pressuretest on these documents: does the position hold together?",
"display_name": "Pressure Test",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "radar",
"short_description": "Test whether a legal position holds together on its own documents"
},
"name": "pressuretest",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e84b748191a7492f9690dc52e2"
},
{
"description": "Regulatory research, refreshing earlier research, jurisdiction comparison and legality checks built on primary sources — retrieves the instrument from its official publisher, proves which version it is, and quotes only from the bytes it fetched. Use when the user has a regulation problem: understanding what a law requires, checking whether text they hold is current, re-running earlier research against the instrument as it stands today, or comparing how a rule differs across markets. Domain- and sector-agnostic: any instrument, country or area of law. Trigger even without the word \"regulatory\" — e.g. \"what does the AI Act require,\" \"is this still in force,\" \"has this changed since we advised,\" \"how does this differ in the UK,\" \"we're planning to launch X, where does that land,\" \"find me the actual text of,\" \"is our compliance memo out of date.\" Answers questions about legal requirements with cited support; identifies unresolved facts and judgments without deciding disputed application questions.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $regulatory to find the controlling official text and prove its version.",
"display_name": "Regulatory",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "search",
"short_description": "Primary-source regulatory research and checks"
},
"name": "regulatory",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118ecaf548191ad10f8400f77fb95"
},
{
"description": "Draft concise time-entry narratives from the lawyer's work in the current conversation, selected related chats, LQ skill exchanges, and supplied accounts, documents or expressly selected folders. Resolve material uncertainty about the lawyer's contribution; return an unposted draft without time figures or billability decisions.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $timenarratives to draft narratives from my work in this conversation and any selected sources, resolving material uncertainty about my contribution.",
"display_name": "Time Narratives",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "pen",
"short_description": "Draft narratives from your work conversations"
},
"name": "timenarratives",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118ea64088191940a5fe585aecbd2"
},
{
"description": "Build, explore, and maintain a lawyer's personal legal wiki: linked, source-grounded Markdown notes that preserve reusable law and method, never matter facts. Use when the user wants to add trusted knowledge, ask what their wiki says, browse it, or check its health.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $wiki to open my legal wiki and show its Wiki Home.",
"display_name": "Wiki",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "hierarchy",
"short_description": "Build and explore your personal legal wiki"
},
"name": "wiki",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e8541881918f21e07b7fc6cd1c"
},
{
"description": "Draft or revise U.S. litigation, hearing, or regulator advocacy and neutral client legal analysis with direct prose, source fidelity, and an explicit candor boundary. Use when the reader, purpose, requested outcome, or audience requires choosing between persuasive advocacy and balanced advice.",
"interface": {
"brand_color": "#2d2d2d",
"default_prompt": "Use $writing to draft this litigation document in the right advocacy or neutral-analysis mode.",
"display_name": "Litigation Writing",
"icon_large_url": null,
"icon_small_url": null,
"iconography": "pen",
"short_description": "Draft advocacy or neutral legal analysis"
},
"name": "writing",
"plugin_release_skill_id": "pluginrsk_6aa118e7539881918ef433133c418c1f"
}
],
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"scope": "GLOBAL",
"share_url": "https://chatgpt.com/plugins/plugins_6aa118e4284081918b44f45b58d06de6?open_in_app",
"status": "ENABLED"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: 4c5bd80cb594d1d397b32e497b7ee0930435ba6584cbd7cc9b09edff637abcef