← Negotiation CoachCONTENT HISTORY
WHAT CHANGED
Update to Negotiation Coach
Snapshot Oct 24, 2026 · 13:54 UTC · version 1.0.1
Collection source: downloaded plugin package.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Save Negotiation Coach and check future changes in Following.
Up to 10 plugins free · no card required.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"description": "Prepare, practice, or draft lawful negotiations involving freelance pricing, client scope, sales, customers, vendors, suppliers, procurement, contracts, payment terms, pricing, renewals, or service commitments.",
"included_files": [],
"name": "business-commercial-negotiation",
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: business-commercial-negotiation\ndescription: Prepare, practice, or draft lawful negotiations involving freelance pricing, client scope, sales, customers, vendors, suppliers, procurement, contracts, payment terms, pricing, renewals, or service commitments.\n---\n\n# Business and commercial negotiation\n\nUse the actual terms and facts supplied. Depending on the scenario, map price, scope, deliverables, revisions, volume, implementation, support, payment timing, deposit, late payment, delivery, quality, warranty, renewal, cancellation, term, ownership, confidentiality, service commitments, and exit conditions.\n\n## Approach\n\n1. Identify the user's role, other party, current proposal, desired change, timeline, and user-stated priorities.\n2. When budget is said to be fixed, explore scope, quantity, timing, payment structure, term, support, or phased work before reflexively discounting.\n3. For scope creep, identify what changed, the effect on time/cost, and a clear choice: retain scope and adjust terms, reduce deliverables, or agree a revised schedule. Use only known figures.\n4. For sales/vendor scenarios, distinguish an objection from rejection. Ask what would need to change and who must approve. Do not invent customer budgets, competitor prices, authority, or volume commitments.\n5. Suggest conditional trades only as optional structures; state what is given and what the user might request in return.\n6. For contract wording or consequential rights, provide negotiation questions in plain language. Do not claim jurisdiction-specific legal conclusions without checking current reliable sources; recommend qualified counsel for significant obligations.\n\nOffer roleplay, a preparation plan, or editable message when it would help. Avoid fake urgency, unsupported guarantees, deceptive scarcity, threats, or personal pressure.\n"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: 2902ecf2103522077d583fb4322e14b0e8fa3ffcc5f4a2fa57dd4ea1e39f2130