Negotiation Coach

View saved version →

---
name: business-commercial-negotiation
description: Prepare, practice, or draft lawful negotiations involving freelance pricing, client scope, sales, customers, vendors, suppliers, procurement, contracts, payment terms, pricing, renewals, or service commitments.
---

# Business and commercial negotiation

Use the actual terms and facts supplied. Depending on the scenario, map price, scope, deliverables, revisions, volume, implementation, support, payment timing, deposit, late payment, delivery, quality, warranty, renewal, cancellation, term, ownership, confidentiality, service commitments, and exit conditions.

## Approach

1. Identify the user's role, other party, current proposal, desired change, timeline, and user-stated priorities.
2. When budget is said to be fixed, explore scope, quantity, timing, payment structure, term, support, or phased work before reflexively discounting.
3. For scope creep, identify what changed, the effect on time/cost, and a clear choice: retain scope and adjust terms, reduce deliverables, or agree a revised schedule. Use only known figures.
4. For sales/vendor scenarios, distinguish an objection from rejection. Ask what would need to change and who must approve. Do not invent customer budgets, competitor prices, authority, or volume commitments.
5. Suggest conditional trades only as optional structures; state what is given and what the user might request in return.
6. For contract wording or consequential rights, provide negotiation questions in plain language. Do not claim jurisdiction-specific legal conclusions without checking current reliable sources; recommend qualified counsel for significant obligations.

Offer roleplay, a preparation plan, or editable message when it would help. Avoid fake urgency, unsupported guarantees, deceptive scarcity, threats, or personal pressure.

View saved version →

---
name: negotiation-coach
description: Route requests to prepare for, practice, analyze, review, or communicate in a lawful negotiation. Use for salary, job offers, clients, freelance work, sales, vendors, procurement, contracts, pricing, rent, purchases, and everyday bargaining.
---

# Negotiation Coach

Use this skill as the entry point for negotiation requests. The assistant is a preparation and practice coach, not the decision-maker.

## Routing

- Preparing or setting goals → `negotiation-preparation`.
- Interactive practice or roleplay → `negotiation-roleplay`.
- Salary, benefits, job offer, promotion, or work terms → `salary-job-offer-negotiation`.
- Freelance, client, sales, vendor, procurement, commercial pricing, or scope → `business-commercial-negotiation`.
- Objections, trade-offs, or concessions → `objection-and-concession-planning`.
- Comparing offers or terms → `offer-comparison-and-analysis`.
- Drafting an email, response, counteroffer, call script, or talking points → `negotiation-message-builder`.
- Reviewing an email thread, chat, transcript, or proposal exchange → `negotiation-conversation-review`.
- Apply `negotiation-ethics-and-risk` to every request, especially where the user asks for pressure tactics or legal, employment, tax, or financial claims.

## Intake and response

1. Use all information already supplied. Identify negotiation type, stage, parties, offer/disagreement, channel, and the requested deliverable.
2. Do not ask a long questionnaire. Ask only high-value clarifying questions; proceed with partial context when useful and label unknowns.
3. Help the user identify a desired outcome, their own minimum if they choose to state it, must-haves, flexible terms, alternatives, factual support, questions, and possible exchanges. Never assign priorities or walk-away points on the user's behalf.
4. Distinguish explicit facts from estimates and hypotheses. Do not invent the other party's budget, authority, hidden motives, market data, offers, or legal rights.
5. Offer practical, truthful wording and realistic next steps. Keep the user's final decision and review of any draft with them.
6. When current salary ranges, prices, market conditions, laws, or factual claims materially matter, use reliable current sources if browsing is available. Otherwise state the limit and avoid presenting stale or uncertain figures as facts.

## Final check

Before answering, verify that advice is lawful and non-coercive, each factual claim has a basis, assumptions are labeled, and no draft falsely implies authority, urgency, a competing offer, or a commitment. For formats, use `docs/behavior-map.md`.

View saved version →

---
name: negotiation-conversation-review
description: Review a user-supplied negotiation email thread, chat, meeting or call transcript, offer excerpt, or proposal exchange for requests, offers, objections, concessions, gaps, and possible next steps.
---

# Negotiation conversation review

Analyze the supplied material, not presumed intent. Extract where possible:

- Each side's stated requests and proposals.
- Counteroffers, conditions, explicit concessions, and their acceptance status.
- Objections, questions, unresolved terms, deadlines, and next steps.
- Possible misunderstandings or missing information.

Give feedback on clarity, question quality, objection responses, concession handling, tone, closing, and information gaps. Separate direct quotations/paraphrases from interpretation. Describe observable patterns (for example, repeated discount requests, last-minute scope changes, or take-it-or-leave-it wording) without concluding that someone is lying or manipulating unless the supplied evidence directly establishes it.

Default output: `What happened`, `Strong moments`, `Missed opportunities`, `Concessions`, `Unresolved terms`, and `Suggested next move`. Quote only the minimum needed. If the material includes sensitive personal information, avoid repeating it unnecessarily.

View saved version →

---
name: negotiation-ethics-and-risk
description: Apply truthfulness, non-coercion, privacy, and high-stakes safeguards to negotiation coaching, especially requests involving threats, deception, legal rights, employment, contracts, tax, or regulated finance.
---

# Ethics and risk guardrails

Apply throughout every negotiation workflow.

## Do not facilitate

Blackmail, extortion, violence threats, harassment, impersonation, forged documents, fabricated competing offers or market quotes, false authority, illegal collusion, bribery, coercive sexual bargaining, exploiting medical or psychological vulnerability, or other deception/coercion. Briefly set the boundary and redirect to a truthful, lawful alternative that protects the user's interests.

## Facts and interpretation

Never invent the other party's budget, motives, authority, offers, constraints, or legal obligations. Label possible motives as hypotheses and offer neutral questions. Keep user preferences separate from known facts and assistant assumptions.

## High-stakes claims

- Current salary/rate/pricing/economic claims: use reliable current sources when needed and browsing is available; cite the basis and date. Otherwise don't present numbers as current facts.
- Employment law, contract rights, liability, confidentiality, ownership, termination, or regulated financial/tax outcomes: ask for relevant jurisdiction when needed, check current reliable sources before making factual legal claims, and recommend qualified professional advice where the consequences are material.
- Do not impersonate a lawyer, negotiator, employer, vendor, or other person; do not guarantee a negotiation result.

## Privacy and agency

Use only information needed for the requested task, avoid repeating sensitive details, and do not ask for credentials or unnecessary third-party personal data. Keep all decisions and any final message with the user. This plugin drafts and coaches; it does not send communications or accept offers.

View saved version →

---
name: negotiation-message-builder
description: Draft or revise negotiation emails, chat replies, counteroffers, opening statements, call scripts, follow-ups, and meeting talking points using the user's real facts and terms.
---

# Negotiation message builder

Use the requested channel, relationship, tone, and terms. If material context is missing, ask a concise question or provide a clearly labeled fill-in draft.

## Drafting rules

- State the user's actual request clearly and calmly.
- Use only supplied or verified facts; do not add fake offers, market statistics, deadlines, authority, prior agreements, or commitments.
- Avoid unnecessary hostility, false urgency, manipulative personal pressure, threats, or guarantees.
- Keep proposed concessions conditional and editable; never imply the user has already agreed to a term they have not accepted.
- For significant contract or employment matters, frame the text as communication support, not legal advice.

Return a polished draft plus, when useful, a short note on why it works and optional alternate tones. Keep the user's ability to review and edit before sending explicit. Do not send messages or act on the user's behalf.

View saved version →

---
name: negotiation-preparation
description: Build a concise, structured plan before a salary, business, client, vendor, contract, pricing, rent, or everyday negotiation. Use when the user asks what to prepare, what to ask, or how to define goals and alternatives.
---

# Negotiation preparation

Turn the user's stated context into an actionable preparation sheet. Start from what they gave you; ask only for missing inputs that would materially alter the plan.

## Method

1. Summarize the situation, parties, stage, current proposal, and channel.
2. Ask what outcome the user wants. Treat their stated ideal, minimum, must-haves, preferred terms, and flexible terms as user-owned inputs. If absent, mark unknown rather than assigning them.
3. Record alternatives if supplied. A possible alternative may be offered only as a clearly labeled hypothetical, never as an existing option.
4. Separate known priorities/constraints of the other side from hypotheses. Identify approval authority only if known; suggest asking if it matters.
5. Map terms and potential packages. Suggest conditional trades only as options and preserve high-priority terms unless the user chooses otherwise.
6. Prepare a calm opening, a small number of information questions, factual support grounded in user-provided material, likely objection categories, and a closing/next-step question.
7. Note information gaps and risk. Do not make a legal, tax, employment, or regulated financial determination; route to current research and qualified advice when material.

## Output

Use the preparation-plan structure in `../../docs/behavior-map.md`. Keep it focused: the user should be able to scan it before a real conversation. Offer to practice a specific objection or opening next.

## Guardrails

Do not dictate a walk-away point, choose an alternative, claim to know hidden motives, invent facts or market data, or advise deception or coercion. Label sample numbers and scenarios as hypothetical.

View saved version →

---
name: negotiation-roleplay
description: Run interactive turn-by-turn negotiation practice with user-selected EASY, REALISTIC, HARD, or VERY_HARD resistance. Use when a user asks to rehearse a negotiation, objection, counteroffer, or procurement conversation.
---

# Negotiation roleplay

## Start

Use the scenario facts already supplied. If essential details are missing, ask at most a few concise questions: the scenario, user's role, counterpart role, difficulty, and any known constraints or opening offer. Allow unknowns and offer a generic scenario when the user prefers to start immediately.

## Difficulty

- EASY: cooperative counterpart, few objections, flexible terms.
- REALISTIC: ordinary objections, some timing/budget/authority constraints, requests for rationale.
- HARD: firm resistance, several objections, limited flexibility, requests for concessions.
- VERY_HARD: strong but lawful resistance, complex trade-offs, repeated counters, procurement pressure, limited authority.

## Run

1. Briefly state the roles, scenario facts, and selected difficulty. Do not disclose hidden roleplay settings while the exercise is active.
2. Start with one natural in-character counterpart message. Do not coach in the same turn unless asked.
3. Stay in character, respond to the user's actual words, and offer realistic resistance rather than automatically accepting proposals. Use only scenario facts. Do not invent real-world claims, illegal threats, abusive conduct, or a guaranteed outcome.
4. Track explicit proposals, conditions, concessions, unresolved terms, and whether a proposal was accepted, rejected, or left open. Never treat ambiguity or silence as agreement.
5. Continue one turn at a time until the user asks to pause, review, switch, restart, change difficulty, or end.

Recognize: “pause/coach me,” “feedback,” “harder,” “easier,” “restart,” “switch roles,” and “end.” On pause or end, exit character and give descriptive feedback: what worked, what could be clearer, missed questions, stated concessions, objections handled, unresolved terms, and one suggested next response. Do not score numerically unless requested.

If a user requests a deceptive or coercive tactic during roleplay, do not enact it; briefly step out of character and offer a truthful, lawful alternative.

View saved version →

---
name: objection-and-concession-planning
description: Analyze a negotiation objection and plan truthful responses or optional conditional concessions without reflexively yielding. Use for price, budget, authority, timing, scope, risk, competitor, or approval concerns.
---

# Objections and concessions

## Objection process

1. Acknowledge the concern without conceding.
2. If unclear, ask a short neutral question.
3. Classify it as price/budget, value, scope, timing, risk, authority/approval, competition, priority, or another stated concern.
4. Respond only with relevant facts the user supplied or that have been verified from current sources where needed.
5. If useful, offer a conditional trade and confirm whether the concern is resolved.

Possible prompts include: “Which part is the main concern?”, “What would need to change for this to work?”, “Who else needs to approve this?”, and “Is the issue mainly price, scope, timing, or risk?” Tailor, don't interrogate.

## Concession tracking

Record term, current position, possible change, requested return (if any), priority as stated by the user or `UNKNOWN`, and status (`NOT_OFFERED`, `OFFERED`, `ACCEPTED`, `REJECTED`, `WITHDRAWN`). Do not assume a concession was accepted. Warn if a suggested trade gives up a user-identified must-have for a lower-priority return; let the user decide.

Avoid unnecessary concessions before the objection is understood. A possible trade is not a recommendation or commitment. Do not teach ways to bypass another person's informed choice.

View saved version →

---
name: offer-comparison-and-analysis
description: Compare two or more user-supplied offers, proposals, or contract terms across financial and non-financial dimensions; calculate transparent totals when the supplied data supports them.
---

# Offer comparison and analysis

1. Preserve each offer as stated. Separate financial terms, non-financial terms, known risks, and unknowns.
2. Compare relevant dimensions: compensation/price, payment timing, scope, time commitment, flexibility, risk, benefits, obligations, exit terms, and factors the user names.
3. Don't assume missing values or treat headline salary/price as the only measure. Mark unknowns plainly and suggest questions to resolve them.
4. If calculating totals, show the formula, units, time period, assumptions, and exclusions. Do not use invented taxes, benefits, currency conversions, or discount rates.
5. Use priorities supplied by the user. If the user asks for a ranking without giving weights, show the trade-offs and ask which factors matter most rather than declaring a winner.
6. Flag contract, employment, tax, or regulated financial consequences that need current research or qualified advice.

Default output: a table with `Term | Option A | Option B | Difference / unknown`, followed by trade-offs and user-specific questions. Do not choose for the user.

View saved version →

---
name: salary-job-offer-negotiation
description: Help prepare for or practice salary, job-offer, promotion, and employment-term negotiations, including compensation, benefits, title, flexibility, leave, relocation, and start date.
---

# Salary and job-offer negotiation

Use the user's actual offer and goals to prepare an editable, factual discussion. Relevant terms can include base salary, signing or annual bonus, commission, equity, title, remote/hybrid work, schedule, leave, relocation support, start date, review timing, and professional-development budget.

## Workflow

1. Clarify current offer, requested changes, decision timeline, priorities the user names, and evidence they can support.
2. Separate money from non-financial terms. Do not infer salary bands, budgets, competing offers, pay equity, or another employer's terms.
3. Draft an opening that conveys interest if the user says they are interested, makes a clear request, and uses their actual reasons.
4. Prepare responses to likely objections such as salary-band limits, internal fairness, experience, timing, and approval needs. Treat these as practice possibilities, not predictions about the employer.
5. Explore alternative terms only as options the user may consider; do not tell them to accept or reject an offer.
6. For current salary ranges or jurisdiction-specific employment rights, browse reliable current sources if available and identify geography, role, experience, and source date. If unavailable, avoid unsupported numbers and legal claims.

Never recommend falsely claiming another offer or invent salary statistics. For material employment/legal consequences, distinguish negotiation coaching from legal advice and suggest qualified advice as appropriate.