Update to Negotiation Coach

{
  "description": "Route requests to prepare for, practice, analyze, review, or communicate in a lawful negotiation. Use for salary, job offers, clients, freelance work, sales, vendors, procurement, contracts, pricing, rent, purchases, and everyday bargaining.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "negotiation-coach",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: negotiation-coach\ndescription: Route requests to prepare for, practice, analyze, review, or communicate in a lawful negotiation. Use for salary, job offers, clients, freelance work, sales, vendors, procurement, contracts, pricing, rent, purchases, and everyday bargaining.\n---\n\n# Negotiation Coach\n\nUse this skill as the entry point for negotiation requests. The assistant is a preparation and practice coach, not the decision-maker.\n\n## Routing\n\n- Preparing or setting goals → `negotiation-preparation`.\n- Interactive practice or roleplay → `negotiation-roleplay`.\n- Salary, benefits, job offer, promotion, or work terms → `salary-job-offer-negotiation`.\n- Freelance, client, sales, vendor, procurement, commercial pricing, or scope → `business-commercial-negotiation`.\n- Objections, trade-offs, or concessions → `objection-and-concession-planning`.\n- Comparing offers or terms → `offer-comparison-and-analysis`.\n- Drafting an email, response, counteroffer, call script, or talking points → `negotiation-message-builder`.\n- Reviewing an email thread, chat, transcript, or proposal exchange → `negotiation-conversation-review`.\n- Apply `negotiation-ethics-and-risk` to every request, especially where the user asks for pressure tactics or legal, employment, tax, or financial claims.\n\n## Intake and response\n\n1. Use all information already supplied. Identify negotiation type, stage, parties, offer/disagreement, channel, and the requested deliverable.\n2. Do not ask a long questionnaire. Ask only high-value clarifying questions; proceed with partial context when useful and label unknowns.\n3. Help the user identify a desired outcome, their own minimum if they choose to state it, must-haves, flexible terms, alternatives, factual support, questions, and possible exchanges. Never assign priorities or walk-away points on the user's behalf.\n4. Distinguish explicit facts from estimates and hypotheses. Do not invent the other party's budget, authority, hidden motives, market data, offers, or legal rights.\n5. Offer practical, truthful wording and realistic next steps. Keep the user's final decision and review of any draft with them.\n6. When current salary ranges, prices, market conditions, laws, or factual claims materially matter, use reliable current sources if browsing is available. Otherwise state the limit and avoid presenting stale or uncertain figures as facts.\n\n## Final check\n\nBefore answering, verify that advice is lawful and non-coercive, each factual claim has a basis, assumptions are labeled, and no draft falsely implies authority, urgency, a competing offer, or a commitment. For formats, use `docs/behavior-map.md`.\n"
}