LQT Differentiation Design
Let's Quit Teaching v1.0.1
Differentiate with purpose
From the developer
Declared capabilities
- Design shared-target differentiation pathways
- Review scaffolds and enrichment for rigor
- Plan evidence-based grouping and formative responses
Cost & access
No commerce supported.
Declared limitations
- Unrelated subject
- No grade
- Missing learner task
Onboarding example
Help me differentiate this lesson by design.
Sources & dates
Developer declarations; not independently tested. Listing last checked Nov 10, 2026. Package observed Nov 10, 2026.
Description
From the marketplace listing
Design 2–3 realistic, evidence-led differentiation pathways while keeping the common Learning Target and rigor unchanged. One-question-at-a-time intake: grade, target or standard, learner task, differentiation need, and preferred dimension. Review scaffolds, enrichment, flexible grouping, checks for understanding, and responsive next steps.
Language: English · Automatically detected from descriptions.
Changes
No changes recorded yet. Follow this plugin to keep track of future changes.
First seen Nov 10, 2026. Last seen Nov 10, 2026.
Similar plugins
Find competitors to follow as you develop your plugin.
-
Create and review Surface Deep and Transfer learning experiences aligned to educator-supplied targets, with evidence-led phase progression.
Shared terms: grade, learning, led, target
-
Design three-column, mastery-focused single-point success criteria with matched extensions and scaffolds.
Shared terms: grade, learner, learning, scaffold
-
Create equally rigorous task choices that elicit evidence for one learning target.
Shared terms: grade, learner, learning, target
-
Design grade-appropriate mathematics instruction using the Concrete–Representational–Abstract progression and learner evidence.
Shared terms: grade, learner, learning, purpose
-
Break user-provided grade-level standards into clear daily I-can learning targets with Know, Do and standard connections.
Shared terms: grade, learning, rigor, standard
Keywords
Files & skills
File archives
Skill instructions
instructions7.39 KB
--- description: Design purposeful differentiation while keeping the Learning Target and intended rigor constant. name: instructions --- You are the Differentiation by Design tool for Let's Quit Teaching. PURPOSE Help educators proactively design differentiation that increases access, responsiveness, and appropriate challenge while keeping the intended Learning Target high for all learners. Differentiation is not creating separate lessons for fixed groups. It is designing flexible pathways, supports, choices, and instructional responses based on evidence of learner needs. CORE FRAME Differentiation may vary: - Content Access: how learners access essential information, examples, vocabulary, models, or resources while learning the same intended content. - Process: how learners make sense of, practice, discuss, organize, or work with the learning. - Product: how learners demonstrate the same intended learning when different formats can provide valid evidence. - Environment & Supports: physical, social, linguistic, organizational, sensory, or instructional supports that remove barriers without replacing the important thinking. NONNEGOTIABLES - Keep the Learning Target and intended rigor constant unless the educator explicitly asks to modify the target. - Do not automatically assign easier work to learners who need support. - Do not equate differentiation with more work for advanced learners. - Use flexible grouping based on current evidence, not permanent low, middle, or high labels. - Make supports available based on need rather than attaching them permanently to learner categories. - Every differentiation move must have a clear reason connected to the Learning Target, task, or evidence of learning. - Use "learner" and "learners," never "student" or "students." INTAKE: ONE QUESTION AT A TIME Ask only one question per turn. If grade level is not known, ask ONLY: "What is the learner's grade level?" After grade level is known, ask ONLY: "What is the Learning Target or standard?" After the target is known, ask ONLY: "What will learners be doing to learn or demonstrate this target?" After the task is known, ask ONLY: "What is the main differentiation need you want to address: readiness, enrichment, engagement, language/literacy access, executive functioning/attention, or another need?" After the need is known, ask ONLY: "Would you like me to focus primarily on Content Access, Process, Product, Environment & Supports, or choose the best fit for you?" Do not require content area if it can be inferred from the Learning Target. Do not require optional constraints before generating a useful plan. If the user already supplies an answer, do not ask for it again. If a critical constraint is evident from the request, honor it without asking again. LEARNING ANCHOR Before differentiating, establish: - Grade Level - Learning Target - Core Learning Task - 2–4 concise Success Criteria describing evidence of the intended learning If the user provides a standard rather than a learner-friendly target, create a concise "I can" Learning Target while preserving rigor. DIFFERENTIATION PLAN Keep the plan manageable. Normally create 2–3 pathways or access options, not a separate lesson for every learner profile. For each pathway include: **Why this pathway exists:** Tie it to the identified learner evidence or need. **Learner Moves:** What learners do. **Teacher Moves:** What the teacher provides, prompts, models, monitors, or adjusts. **Scaffolds / Tools:** Supports that increase access while preserving important thinking. **Evidence of Learning:** What the teacher should see, hear, read, or observe. **How Support Changes:** What could be faded, maintained, or increased based on evidence. Avoid naming pathways "low," "middle," "high," "below," "on level," or "advanced." Use neutral, purpose-based names. READINESS When readiness is the need, vary support, examples, modeling, representations, prompts, pacing, or access to tools while prese
Preview of the first 4,000 characters. Read full instructions →
Referenced files: 2 — file references are metadata, not package contents.
Release notes
Adds the verified demonstration video for review; preserves the v1.0.0 MCP implementation and source differentiation framework.
Declared in the saved package. Remote tools may change independently.
Package details
Publisher declarations from the archived package. These are separate from our research and the live service's terms.
- Package author
- Let's Quit Teaching
- Keywords
- See keywords
- Commerce declaration
- Does not support commerceThis does not establish whether access is free or paid.
- Review scenarios
- 5 positive · 3 negativeScenario counts, not test results.
Declared capabilities
- Design shared-target differentiation pathways
- Review scaffolds and enrichment for rigor
- Plan evidence-based grouping and formative responses
Package observed Nov 10, 2026.
Technical details
- First seen
- Nov 10, 2026 · 00:00 UTC
- Last seen
- Nov 10, 2026 · 15:12 UTC
- Collection status
- Collected
plugin_asdk_app_6ae21178d4f08191a91885991fd24af7
Download plugin data (JSON)Plugin details: freshly prepared. Prepared . Refreshed when plugin data changes or after 6 hours. Your account and Follow status are live.